The Department of State Services (DSS) has rejected allegations that the detention of journalist Zainab Sodiq was politically motivated, insisting that its actions were guided by established security protocols and the need to clarify issues surrounding the possession of a drone at the airport. The agency maintained that claims of persecution and personal targeting were unfounded and aimed at portraying a routine security process as an act of repression.
According to security sources, the interception of the drone at the Murtala Muhammed Airport was not connected to any individual or political disagreement but was part of the DSS’s responsibility to investigate security-related concerns involving equipment that could potentially pose risks if used without proper clearance. The agency argued that modern security threats require vigilance, especially around airports and other sensitive locations.
The DSS reportedly questioned Zainab Sodiq after the drone was discovered in her possession because authorities needed to establish ownership, purpose of use, and compliance with relevant regulations governing unmanned aerial devices. The agency maintained that the process was a standard security screening exercise and not an attempt to intimidate a journalist or interfere with legitimate media work.
Officials also dismissed claims that the detention was designed to frustrate the bail process of activist Omoyele Sowore, describing such allegations as speculative and lacking evidence. They argued that linking the journalist’s encounter with security personnel to a broader political conspiracy was an attempt to distract from the actual security concerns surrounding the drone.
The service further maintained that it respects constitutional rights, including freedom of expression and press freedom, but stressed that journalists and other citizens are not exempt from security checks when issues involving national safety arise. According to the DSS, accountability and due process must apply to everyone regardless of profession, status, or affiliation.
Security authorities also questioned accusations against the DSS Director-General, Tosin Ajayi, describing them as personal attacks rather than genuine concerns about the conduct of the agency. They argued that decisions taken by security institutions are based on operational responsibilities and not on personal interests or disagreements with individuals.
The DSS urged members of the public to disregard what it described as misleading narratives aimed at damaging the reputation of security institutions. The agency emphasised that Nigeria’s security challenges require cooperation between citizens and security agencies, adding that legitimate oversight and criticism are welcome but should not be used to spread unverified claims.
The service reaffirmed its commitment to protecting national security while operating within the limits of the law. It stated that the agency would continue to carry out its duties professionally, insisting that security procedures are not acts of intimidation but necessary measures to safeguard citizens and critical national assets.